Wednesday, July 23, 2014
This seems to be related to a race to the bottom, either caused by or facilitated by technology. Assuming the move to automation and large scale processing cannot be stopped, we might consider what changes to the human side of the equation might be feasible and beneficial:
- Limiting work hours
- Higher minimum wages
- Stronger social safety net
- Significantly higher taxation of upper incomes
- Recovering our democracy from corporations
Limiting how much harm technology, corporate power, and wealth accumulation cause would increase human freedom, although individuals like Perkins, et al., will perceive such changes fascist and as theft, they are necessary to preserve human dignity for all of society.
Original Article and Post Here
Responding to Men Don’t Want to Be Nurses. Their Wives Agree. in the NY Times: The US has some deeply ingrained aspects that make this sit...
Often, the editors or authors of articles some posts as being NYT Picks, presumably because they are insightful and uncommon. I was gratifie...
Another comment was noted as a NYT Pick, this one in a Krugman comment thread, Populism, Real and Phony - The New York Times A recent art...
This is a comment on a NY Times article, In Brooklyn, Stifling Higher Learning Among Hasidic Women . Not Jewish, nor a believer, myself, I...