I've no strong reason for starting a blog, although the original reason was as a foray into writing. Since this blog was started several years ago, while I was reading Beckett - all of his work, not just Godot - my focus was on humanity. In many ways my focus is still on humanity, although the focus has become strongly political. There are enough people spouting their views, so I won't spend an inordinate amount of time describing mine, other than to say that I could be classified as a libertarian socialist, and the only way I could plainly describe my political outlook is that I believe that all individuals deserve a decent and humane life, much along the lines of the northern European states, and should have a significant amount of choice, not dictated by the interests of corporations, plutocrats, and authoritarian government.
In response to an Ender's Game discussion (Goodreads), with a link from Reddit, I posted the following: Much of the Reddit stream seems to focus on military tactics, or the lack thereof, used by the Ender, but who reads Ender and thinks it about military tactics, except the 20-year old grunt that started the thread? For a book written in the 80's, then edited in the early 90's, it seems more prophetic, with its use of game immersion, remote military operations and portable computing. Then when you think about the use of children in military games, one can think somewhat more deeply about sociopolitical indoctrination. The series itself becomes a broader exploration of empathy and foreign culture. The criticism seems more like the problem of a man with a hammer, who thinks every problem is solved by hammering, but even worse, every problem is about hammering. An additional post, regarding suspension of disbelief: Some people commented on the suspension of disbelie...
Comments