Skip to main content

How to Discourage Aurora Copy Cats? (A Response)

A response to an article on The Atlantic:

Yuk! Where do I begin to critique this article?
  • I have read analyses that show that increased, broadly reported media portrayal decrease the likelihood of copycats. Other than the common belief, do you have any facts or studies regarding copycats?
  • You actually assume the usual simplistic analyses of loneliness and retaliation. It is more likely that Holmes failure in his Ph.D. program was an indication of a faltering ego, of someone slipping into mental illness, rather than the cause of his action
  • You believe Holmes is gratified at seeing his picture plastered across the media. That is true, only as far as any psychotic might be gratified to see his own picture.
  • His picture is disrespectful to victims? This is simply more pandering to the masses and that is usually just a justification for vigilantism, more of the punitive justice system that has failed for so long.
  • Certainly empathy matters, and concern for the current and future welfare of those impacted is good, but as mentioned, the concern for victims is typically used to for abrogate the accused’s' rights, and by punishing some even more severely. Instead, how about something that might reduce or solve the problem, like government-provided mental health services, or if you go along with the simplistic idea the cause was that he was a loser and alienated, why not just have true government-supported educational system. And as always, there is gun control.
Nothing that you would suggest, or that this government will do, will stop these crimes. There will always be psychoses. There will always be the disaffected and alienated. There is the internet, with its bounty of information about almost anything you might not want someone to know. Even the actions that might reduce the likelihood of these crimes are not even on the table, considering the loons that form the Republican party.

What are our options?
  • Gun control, not even a ban, just simply registering weaponry?
  • Cracking down on the small number of suppliers supplying most illegal guns?
  • Single payer health care, and the related mental health services?
  • Laws, or even administrative action, against bullying?
  • Republicans coming to their senses and joining the 21st century?
  • Cogent, broadly handled, analyses of the illness that these crimes entail?
How about we just throw a big party and invite everyone, taking special care to make the outsiders feel liked? There is no chance anything of real value will happen anyway...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition

Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition by Geert Hofstede My rating: 4 of 5 stars A detailed and fascinating review of Hofstede's dimensions, by the researcher himself, showing broad high-level insights into history and culture, although a bit tedious, as it often describes in detail relationships many of us implicitly understand. View all my reviews

Global Warming and Methane Reduction

I was an ovolactovegetarian for several years in my twenties, in the late 1980's, but the lack of convenient food sources, social pressure, and mild athletic anemia, pushed me to adopt more meat-oriented diet. Also, being an insulin-dependent diabetic, eating low-fat, low-carbohydrate protein sources reduced my need for injections. Over time, I have returned to vegetarianism, although my reasons are grounded in self-interest and concern for the environment. My energy consumption is relatively low, as I live in a major city and very selectively use automobiles for transportation. Lately though, I have been reminded that domesticated animals are large contributors to global warming (methane creation) and inefficient protein producers (4 to 16 pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat). Additionally, vegetarianism, and related calorie reduction, are associated with increased longevity. Both have pushed my back to vegetarianism. Regardless of the history, vegetarianism is a better c...

Daily Fantasy Fools

The NY Times ran a piece on daily fantasy sports , of which I felt the need to say something: #1: The skilled and privileged taking advantage of the stupid and the ill. #2: I remember being disgusted after reading how a startup founder for Box targeted the biggest losers on a poker site to raise 100K for his venture. Well, you could think him smart, or you could think him corrupt, taking advantage of the stupid and addicted, but regardless, do you want to buy anything from him, knowing that his path to success is based on taking advantage of others? Eventually, that means taking advantage of you...