Skip to main content

Review: Data Mining for Fund Raisers

Data Mining For Fund Raisers: How To Use Simple Statistics To Find The Gold In Your Donor Database   Even If You Hate Statistics: A Starter GuideData Mining For Fund Raisers: How To Use Simple Statistics To Find The Gold In Your Donor Database Even If You Hate Statistics: A Starter Guide by Peter B. Wylie
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

My spouse, a development researcher of high-net worth individuals, was given this book because she was the 'numbers' person in the office. Since my undergraduate was focused on lab-design, including analysis of results using statistics, I was intrigued and decided to read it. Considering my background, I found some of the material obvious, while others aspects were good refreshers on thinking in terms of statistics.

Below is the synopsis I wrote at the time I read it:

Purpose of Book

* To provide a general outline of a statistically-oriented method to improve funding activities by mining your current donor database
* To provide general techniques for analyzing data, as well as provide cautions against bad techniques

How the Process Can Improve Endowment Activities

* Allows the organization to more accurately target quality prospects, either to increase participation rates, or to find major givers more inclined to donate
* Allows the organization to reduce costs, or more effectively use limited resources, i.e., phone smaller sets of people, limit the size of mailings, while increasing donations

Outline of Method (Non-Technical)

1. Export sample of donor database
2. Split sample into smaller components
3. Find relationships between donor features and giving
4. Select the significant variables
5. Develop scoring system
6. Validate findings
7. Test finding on limited appeals and compare results

Assumptions

* Assumes the donor data is extractable and randomized
* Requires export from donor database, or access via SQL
* Assumes additional software for statistics (DataDesk, SAS, SPSS)

Limitations

* Requires IT staff, analytical staff, donor contacts, and management to coordinate efforts
* Requires IT and analytical staff have adequate skills to implement
* Judges variables of data by both its intrinsic value and based upon its inclusion in database

View all my reviews

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst by Robert M. Sapolsky My rating: 5 of 5 stars I finished reading this crying. It is a work of neurobiology, social science, anthropology, and history, but ultimately it is a work of great humanity, suggesting ways that humans, our groups, our systems, and our societies can be made better. View all my reviews

Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition

Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition by Geert Hofstede My rating: 4 of 5 stars A detailed and fascinating review of Hofstede's dimensions, by the researcher himself, showing broad high-level insights into history and culture, although a bit tedious, as it often describes in detail relationships many of us implicitly understand. View all my reviews

The Right to Write - NYTimes.com

In an article,  The Right to Write - NYTimes.com , I commented on the right to write, since writers are sometimes questioned on the validity of their writing, e.g., Harriet Beecher Stowe with Uncle Tom's Cabin: One, people always have the right to write, but readers concurrently have the right to reject said writing. Much personal criticism of depictions from writers is whether the depiction seems valid or plausible, but even that is an exercise in empathy, since it requires one to experience that depiction ideationally.  Two, there is a streak in Americans, and maybe anyone, that states that you cannot understand 'my pain', usually the death of a child or some horrific personal lose. Over a longer term I have sensed that people most easily accept empathy if it is expressed by someone with similar experiences, an aspect I believe is part of human nature. I find both irksome, since they deny empathy.