Skip to main content

The Death of the Sick Day - Responses


#1

The ability to work remotely has both enhanced and deprived us of our personal time. In many ways, the pleasure of working from home can be wonderful, as does the ability to leave early to attend to children and then finishing up afterward remotely. Even working from home while sick can be nice if one's concern is to avoid making others sick or to hasten recovery for other types of illnesses. That said, there does come a time when one really needs to turn off work completely if one needs to recover. I've had a few of those instances, where I grew progressively worse unless I just went to sleep and took a few days.

Even then, there are many people that feel obligated to keep working, tied to their cell phones and some sense of duty. In the worst case, I am reminded of a person at a financial institution, and that person's father, a board member, had passed away. They were still taking calls during his wake, and this as not someone callous and uncaring. It was obvious the father's death greatly troubled them. I thought some people might see that as devotion, but it seemed horrible that they felt obligated to work as their father lay dead.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/style/the-death-of-the-sick-day.html?comments#permid=30086152

#2

@Randall - It's amazing that you have little concern for all the people you could affect, from your coworkers to their families. There are people that have significant illnesses that could be harmed by you. You should read through the comments to see all the concern people have about harming others. That said, it is sad that you are in a situation, or at least it sounds like a situation, where you cannot take a sick day for fear of losing pay.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/style/the-death-of-the-sick-day.html?comments#permid=30085609:30087077

#3

@tiddl - Typically, the flu and colds are passed hand-to-mouth, so someone who is sick only has to touch things that other people touch and those people touching their mouths to their food, to get sick. Honestly, it only takes one sick food employee to infect many, many people.

When sick, I tend to be obsessive about washing my hands, and not touching shared items like food and handles, to avoid infecting others.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/style/the-death-of-the-sick-day.html?comments#permid=30085609:30085942:30087679:30088023

#4

@Chris - Yes, follow my same, slightly obsessive procedures, but do shake hands, and yes, absolutely right about it being kids. Once someone in the family gets sick, then everybody gets sick, including parents. In fact, it was always the parents with young children getting sick. At my previous employer, on some team meetings, it was always a bit of a laugh...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/style/the-death-of-the-sick-day.html?comments#permid=30085609:30085942:30087679:30088023:30090427:30091096



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst by Robert M. Sapolsky My rating: 5 of 5 stars I finished reading this crying. It is a work of neurobiology, social science, anthropology, and history, but ultimately it is a work of great humanity, suggesting ways that humans, our groups, our systems, and our societies can be made better. View all my reviews

A Journey — if You Dare — Into the Minds of Silicon Valley Programmers

My responses in a NY Times comment section for the book, Coders: The Making of a New Tribe and the Remaking of the World by Clive Thompson : #1 - Link Although I've been a software developer for 15 years, and for longer alternating between a project manager, team lead, or analyst, mostly in finance, and now with a cancer center, I found it funny that you blame the people doing the coding for not seeing the harm it could cause. First, most scientific advancement has dark elements, and it is usually not the science but how it is used and sold by business people that is the problem. This leads to the second problem, in that it is not coding that is in itself problematic, but specifically how technology is harnessed to sell. It is normal and desirable to track users, to log actions, to collect telemetry, so as to monitor systems, respond to errors, and to develop new features, but that normal engineering practice has been used to surveil users for the purpose of selling. Blaming

Don't learn to code. Learn to think.

A response to  Don't learn to code. Learn to think. : Below is is my usual response when I see an article stating that everyone should learn to code:  Rather than programming, it is more important to impart the thinking of computer science (CS) than a specific implementation. Programming can be an end point for some students, but it is likely that programming itself will be increasingly automated, so that one needs more the general concepts common in CS. Even then, programming itself is to some degree a grunt task that one progresses beyond:  The following are typical components of a CS degree: algorithms & flowcharting systems thinking logical systems and set theory object-orientation & patterns probability, statistics, mathematics All of the above can be useful in an increasingly automated and data-driven world.